Wikifunctions:Requests for deletions
Latest comment: 5 days ago by Ameisenigel in topic Untitled (Z16448)
Functions or implementations or tests who do not work properly or meet notability criteria can be deleted. Please nominate items for deletions under the "Requests for deletion" section below.
If it is obvious vandalism, just report it in Wikifunctions:Report vandalism, or ping an administrator. Contact can also be made with an administrator on Telegram or IRC #wikipedia-abstract.
 | SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 1 day. |
| edit |
|
|---|
| Archives |
No idea why we would need this string as a ZID. --Ameisenigel (talk) 13:58, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- See Special:Search/Z11488.--GZWDer (talk) 16:27, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- That just redirects me to Z11488. --Ameisenigel (talk) 19:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Try Special:Search//"Z11488". It looks like deleting this object would break two test cases. GrounderUK (talk) 07:13, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Interesting, why does this not show up at [1]? --Ameisenigel (talk) 17:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- I think that’s phab:T361701. GrounderUK (talk) 04:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Shouldn't it be possible to have this tests without the ZID by using the string directly? --Ameisenigel (talk) 18:25, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- That should always be possible, yes. We don’t have many Z6 objects and these few should all provide a justification, in my opinion. I don’t have a view on what should be considered adequate justification, however. GrounderUK (talk) 05:35, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- I have changed both tests to use the string directly. --Ameisenigel (talk) 13:56, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- That should always be possible, yes. We don’t have many Z6 objects and these few should all provide a justification, in my opinion. I don’t have a view on what should be considered adequate justification, however. GrounderUK (talk) 05:35, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Interesting, why does this not show up at [1]? --Ameisenigel (talk) 17:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Try Special:Search//"Z11488". It looks like deleting this object would break two test cases. GrounderUK (talk) 07:13, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- That just redirects me to Z11488. --Ameisenigel (talk) 19:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of Standard Moroccan Tamazight cardinal, input = 10 (Z16451). --Ideophagous (talk) 20:46, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- I guess we should delete Standard Moroccan Tamazight cardinal, input = 10 (Z16451) instead, Untitled (Z16448) is slightly older. --Ameisenigel (talk) 08:54, 26 May 2024 (UTC)